<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Design Tools: Yahoo&#8217;s hidden gem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techwhimsy.com/yahoo-design-tools/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techwhimsy.com/yahoo-design-tools</link>
	<description>Where tech is more than just the breaking news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:51:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane</title>
		<link>http://techwhimsy.com/yahoo-design-tools/comment-page-1#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 01:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwhimsy.com/?p=101#comment-273</guid>
		<description>That was my first thought when I saw the volume of useful looking modules - what size would the final payload be?  I hate when a site takes forever to load because it&#039;s got a big fat Javascript file.

My Javascript skills are rudimentary at best but as long as I can understand what the different libraries do, I&#039;m confident I could hack together something that I needed.

I&#039;ve met people who swear blind that all Javascript files on a website should be readable and that &#039;obfuscated files&#039; (their words) are a scourge on free information flows.  Crazy.  I&#039;d rather view an optimised site than a sluggish &#039;free&#039; one any day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was my first thought when I saw the volume of useful looking modules &#8211; what size would the final payload be?  I hate when a site takes forever to load because it&#8217;s got a big fat Javascript file.</p>
<p>My Javascript skills are rudimentary at best but as long as I can understand what the different libraries do, I&#8217;m confident I could hack together something that I needed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve met people who swear blind that all Javascript files on a website should be readable and that &#8216;obfuscated files&#8217; (their words) are a scourge on free information flows.  Crazy.  I&#8217;d rather view an optimised site than a sluggish &#8216;free&#8217; one any day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NathanaelB</title>
		<link>http://techwhimsy.com/yahoo-design-tools/comment-page-1#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>NathanaelB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwhimsy.com/?p=101#comment-272</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used YUI a couple of times before - great functionality but just have to watch how many libraries you include otherwise you&#039;re forcing 200kb of Javascript down the pipe for something which with a few extra hours you could have custom scripted into a 5kb library; although I&#039;m pretty sure (it&#039;s been a few months) that all modules come in a readable format script with line breaks and indenting and a compressed version where as much whitespace as possible is removed to reduced the file size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used YUI a couple of times before &#8211; great functionality but just have to watch how many libraries you include otherwise you&#8217;re forcing 200kb of Javascript down the pipe for something which with a few extra hours you could have custom scripted into a 5kb library; although I&#8217;m pretty sure (it&#8217;s been a few months) that all modules come in a readable format script with line breaks and indenting and a compressed version where as much whitespace as possible is removed to reduced the file size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

